For the Reform of the Human Ecosystem and Family, Public, and Private Institutions
Author: Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo
Angolan Thinker and Philosopher
Foundations: GAESEMA thought, human dignity, intergenerational responsibility, production, employability, and human administration.
“True reform begins when a person is no longer valued solely for what they possess, but is recognised for who they are, what they can learn, and what they can build with others.”
PREAMBLE — THE QUESTION HUMANITY MUST CONFRONT
We, human beings, are born into a world we did not choose.
Before knowing ownership, we know dependence. Before understanding politics, we know authority. Before studying justice, we experience the effects of how we are treated.
We are born into relationships.
We encounter a family, or people and institutions that take responsibility for welcoming us. We encounter a language, a culture, an economy, a history, and a collective order.
The world begins to reveal itself through those who feed, protect, educate, listen to, or abandon us.
Therefore, humanity’s first question is not merely how to conquer the world. It is how to understand the life we receive and how to assume responsibility for the lives connected to our own.
A child does not choose the circumstances of their birth. Responsibility for creating dignified conditions belongs to adults, communities, and institutions.
Later, that child grows. Learns. Works. Builds relationships. They may become a caregiver, leader, teacher, entrepreneur, public servant, farmer, researcher, or community representative.
What they have learned about respect, fear, recognition, and authority remains with them. Yet they can also question those lessons and develop other ways of acting.
Within this process lies the proposal of Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo:
To understand the relationship between consciousness, the home, and institutions in order to reform the organisation of human life.
This manifesto brings that approach together with production, employability, independence of thought, and administrative responsibility.
It addresses families, schools, businesses, community organisations, religious institutions, political parties, governments, and relations between nations.
Its central question is direct:
What value do we assign to a person when they lose what gave them income, influence, or power?
If someone ceases to be respected because they have lost their job, there is a failure in the family relationship.
If someone must remain in power to avoid persecution, there is a failure in institutional security.
If a child receives attention only when they fulfil adults’ ambitions, there is a failure of care.
If a person can exercise a right only through favours, there is a failure of administration.
If an idea is dismissed because its author does not yet possess the resources to realise it, there is a failure to recognise human capacity.
Reform means confronting these failures and building relationships that preserve dignity through change, hardship, and loss.
I — THE HUMAN BEING BEFORE THE STRUCTURES
Human beings build institutions to respond to needs.
They build families and care networks to sustain life. They build schools to transmit and develop knowledge. They build businesses to organise production. They build public services to fulfil collective functions. They build laws to establish rights, duties, and limits.
These structures must be assessed by how they serve people.
When an institution demands humiliation as the price of access to a service, it departs from its purpose.
When a business exploits the need for employment to impose degrading conditions, it turns human capacity into exploitable vulnerability.
When a family withdraws respect from someone who no longer contributes financially, it confuses the person with their income.
When an authority treats the State as property, it replaces service with domination.
The proposed reform establishes a principle:
No structure should require the diminishment of human dignity to secure its own continuity.
People have responsibilities. They may be held accountable for actions and omissions. They may be subject to legal procedures and legitimate sanctions.
But accountability must respect rights, evidence, proportionality, and the opportunity to defend oneself.
Dignity is not a reward granted to the obedient. It is a standard for how everyone must be treated.
II — THE HUMAN ECOSYSTEM
Consciousness, family, community, work, and the State influence one another.
A decision made at home can affect a child’s learning. An economic decision can alter the stability of that home. An administrative rule can expand or obstruct opportunities. A political dispute can affect security, income, and trust.
Collective life forms an ecosystem because its elements are connected through dependence, influence, and consequences.
This understanding requires us to observe both directions of the relationship.
The home can teach forms of authority that later appear within an institution. A just institution can offer experiences that transform what someone learned at home.
Therefore, personal reform and institutional reform must advance together.
We do not need to wait for everyone to become perfect before improving a school, a court, or a health service.
Nor should we believe that a new regulation will resolve everything when practices continue to encourage humiliation, silence, and impunity.
Rules need people capable of applying them; people need rules that limit abuse and protect choices.
The human ecosystem also includes the natural environment.
Production depends on water, soil, energy, biodiversity, and climatic conditions. An activity may generate immediate benefits while transferring harm to other communities or generations.
Responsibility must extend as far as the consequences.
III — BIRTH AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CARE
Birth makes it clear that no one begins life through their own strength alone.
Autonomy develops through relationships.
Children need care and opportunities to learn. Those who care for them need conditions that allow them to fulfil that responsibility.
An overburdened family should not receive only moral demands. It also needs access to health care, education, income, security, and support.
The thought of Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo finds a starting point here: life presents a responsibility that precedes the struggle for prestige.
The child exists before they produce.
Their dignity does not depend on being useful to adults’ projects.
Reform must ensure that care is not conditional on gender, origin, disability, parentage, or expectations of success.
Children do not belong to adults as property.
They are persons in development.
Education requires boundaries and guidance, but those boundaries must protect and teach.
Discipline loses its purpose when it becomes violence, humiliation, or permanent fear.
IV — THE HOME AS THE FIRST SCHOOL OF AUTHORITY
The home is one of the first places where people learn who decides and how decisions are made.
There, a person may discover that authority listens, explains, and acknowledges mistakes.
They may also learn that the strongest person does not need to justify anything.
These experiences influence later expectations, although they do not inevitably determine the future.
Family reform must bring certain questions into view:
Who is allowed to speak?
Who performs the work of care?
Who controls the resources?
How are conflicts resolved?
What happens when someone becomes ill or loses income?
Is there freedom to disagree?
Does respect remain when the capacity to support the household financially disappears?
A responsible family does not need to abolish every difference in function. It needs to prevent those differences from becoming claims of human superiority.
Supporting a household does not grant the right to control the people who live in it completely.
Being older does not mean always being right.
Caring for someone does not create a debt that authorises emotional blackmail.
Receiving support does not eliminate the right to speak.
Family authority must be exercised as a responsibility for people’s development and safety.
V — THE PERSON WHO LOSES THEIR JOB
Job loss reveals the quality of many relationships.
While someone pays the bills, they may receive attention and recognition. When their income disappears, they may begin to be treated as a burden.
This change causes suffering and weakens the possibility of recovery.
The budget needs adjustment. Tasks may need redistribution. New opportunities must be sought.
But none of these needs requires the withdrawal of respect.
An unemployed person retains experience, knowledge, affection, and the capacity to learn.
Reform proposes:
To adjust economic arrangements without turning hardship into a verdict on human worth.
This principle also applies to illness, disability, and old age.
Someone who cannot generate income does not cease to belong to humanity.
Care, memory, knowledge, and companionship are real contributions. And even when a person’s contribution diminishes, their dignity remains.
VI — THE SPARK AND ITS MATERIALISATION
Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo uses the idea of the spark to value capacity that is still seeking a form.
Before a product exists, there may be a recognised need.
Before a business exists, there may be an idea.
Before a book exists, there may be a question.
Before a solution exists, there may be someone willing to learn.
Society loses possibilities when it recognises only what has already been materialised.
However, recognising an idea does not mean declaring that it will succeed.
Between intention and outcome lie knowledge, work, resources, cooperation, evaluation, and circumstances.
Reform must build bridges between these stages.
A spark needs opportunities to be examined and developed:
- Accessible education.
- Technical guidance.
- Tools and workspaces.
- Experimentation.
- Appropriate financing.
- Transparent partnerships.
- Access to markets and services.
- Learning from outcomes and failures.
Recognising potential means creating conditions for its development, rather than promising results without work.
Co-creation acquires a concrete meaning here: different people contribute to turning possibilities into useful realities.
VII — PRODUCTION, EMPLOYABILITY, AND SOCIAL BENEFIT
Work can expand autonomy, income, knowledge, and the capacity to participate.
But these benefits depend on the conditions under which work is performed.
More hours do not necessarily mean greater development.
Unsafe, poorly paid, or exhausting work can produce wealth while destroying health.
Therefore, the thesis of this manifesto is:
More opportunities for decent work and responsible production can generate greater individual and collective benefits.
Rest is part of that responsibility.
Care is also work, even when it is unpaid.
Cultural, scientific, agricultural, industrial, and community production need recognition and suitable conditions.
Employability must offer different paths. Not everyone needs to establish a business. People may contribute through employment, cooperatives, research, public service, cultural activities, and care networks.
A productive society does not measure all of life by the capacity to generate immediate profit.
It also assesses whether its work improves living conditions.
VIII — CORRUPTION AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ABUSE
Unemployment does not make someone corrupt.
Poverty is not evidence of moral failure.
Corruption can be practised by people who have employment, wealth, and influence.
The problem lies in acts of abuse and in the conditions that allow those acts to be committed, concealed, and repeated.
When a person controls an opportunity and demands an improper benefit to grant it, they turn access into an instrument of domination.
When a public office favours relatives without fair criteria, it confuses collective responsibility with private interest.
When oversight depends on the very person who should be overseen, the risk of impunity increases.
Reform requires two fronts.
The first is to expand legitimate opportunities for life and work.
The second is to reduce opportunities for abuse through clear rules, independent oversight, transparency, and accountability.
The fight against corruption must protect society and investigate conduct; it must not stigmatise those facing hardship.
IX — POWER, DISPUTE, AND LIMITS
Power expands the capacity to produce consequences.
A household decision can affect a family. A business decision can affect thousands of workers. A State decision can affect an entire population.
The greater that reach, the more important limits become.
Power can resolve conflicts, coordinate resources, and guarantee rights. It can also concentrate advantages, silence criticism, and create dependence.
The difference lies, in part, in institutional organisation.
The greater the power, the greater the requirement for accountability.
A responsible authority needs defined powers, information, oversight, and the possibility of challenge.
Disagreement must not be treated as personal betrayal.
Research on power helps explain behavioural tendencies under particular conditions, but it does not establish that every powerful person will act in the same way. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Reform must address incentives, limits, and safeguards, rather than relying solely on a leader’s presumed goodness.
X — TRANSITION AND THE FEAR OF LOSS
An institution becomes fragile when leaving leadership means losing security.
Those who fear persecution may seek to remain in office, even against legitimate rules.
This mechanism can appear in countries, businesses, associations, and community organisations.
In Africa, it must be studied with attention to the diversity of countries and their histories. There is no single continental culture that explains every difficulty in transferring power.
Reform proposes legal safeguards for those in government and those in opposition.
Those who leave power must retain their rights.
Those who have committed crimes must be subject to investigation by competent institutions through fair procedures.
Protecting the person does not mean preventing accountability.
The opposition must be able to scrutinise government without persecution. A former leader must not be humiliated for having lost, nor shielded from every investigation simply because they once governed.
The African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance provides guidance on constitutional transfers of power, pluralism, and judicial independence, under the terms applicable to States parties.
Institutional continuity requires the State to remain functional during changes in leadership.
XI — HUMAN ADMINISTRATION
To administer is to organise responsibilities, resources, and decisions.
Human administration must recognise that every procedure affects real people.
A queue can represent time taken away from work.
An incomprehensible document can prevent access to a right.
An unexplained decision can leave someone without a meaningful opportunity to defend themselves.
An exclusively digital platform can exclude those who lack access or the ability to use it.
Reform requires clear procedures and appropriate alternatives.
Every institution should be able to answer:
Who decides?
Under what authority?
Within what timeframe?
On what grounds?
Who can correct an error?
How can a complaint be submitted?
How is continuity preserved when leadership changes?
The Angolan Constitution provides relevant references concerning public administration and safeguards for those dealing with it, including Articles 198 and 200. www.tribunalconstitucional.ao
Their practical application must respect each country’s legal order.
A public service is not a favour granted by the person holding office.
Businesses and associations also need clear responsibilities, protection of information, fair criteria, and complaint channels.
An organisation’s declared mission does not remove the need to scrutinise its practices.
XII — CULTURE, CUSTOM, AND LAW
Culture provides belonging, memory, and language.
Custom organises expectations and can influence norms.
But a practice does not become just merely because it is old.
Reform must preserve what protects life and examine what produces violence or exclusion.
The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights brings together principles concerning dignity, individual rights, peoples’ rights, and social responsibilities. achpr.au.int
National constitutions define their own safeguards and forms of organisation.
The UN Charter supports principles of cooperation and the peaceful settlement of disputes, but it does not replace those constitutions. treaties.un.org
Recognition of cultural diversity must coexist with human equality.
Peoples have distinct histories. They do not constitute different human species.
Within every community, there are different experiences and positions.
Collective identity must allow belonging without demanding absolute obedience.
XIII — EMOTIONS, COMPOSURE, AND JUSTICE
Emotion influences how we interpret events.
Fear can lead to anticipatory defence. Shame can produce silence. Anger can mobilise resistance or cause destruction.
Feeling is not, in itself, a failure.
Responsibility also lies in how we turn feeling into action.
Composure can help us observe, verify, and decide.
But it must not be demanded as a means of preventing denunciation or preserving injustice.
The guiding principle is:
A greater capacity to regulate emotions can reduce avoidable escalation; greater justice is necessary to address the causes of conflict.
A person can protest firmly and act thoughtfully.
They can seek redress without seeking revenge.
They can acknowledge suffering without accepting violence.
Research on emotional regulation helps distinguish response strategies without reducing maturity to the suppression of feelings. emotion.wisc.edu
XIV — SCREENS AND AUTONOMY OF ATTENTION
Technologies make it possible to learn, work, and maintain relationships across distance.
They can also occupy the time needed to rest, reflect, and live with others.
The central issue is the capacity to direct attention.
When every difficulty is met through distraction, a cycle can form: fatigue, prolonged consumption, less rest, greater tension, and a renewed search for distraction.
This pattern does not occur in the same way for everyone.
Reform proposes conscious choices:
Moments together without devices.
Protection of sleep.
Verification of information.
Understanding advertising and platform incentives.
Using technology to support concrete projects.
The experimental study by Allcott and colleagues on Facebook deactivation found both benefits and costs in a specific context, showing that effects must be assessed carefully.
Looking inward means examining one’s own life; looking outward means understanding the conditions in which that life unfolds.
Both are necessary.
XV — ACTIVISM AND FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
Activism can make visible problems that institutions ignore.
Denunciation has value in its own right. It does not need to present an immediate business project to be legitimate.
However, activists can face pressures.
They can become dependent on funding, public attention, or partisan identity. They may fear correcting an opinion because doing so could cost them recognition.
Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo’s thought on moral and social imprisonment makes it possible to discuss this difficulty.
Consistency does not require repeating an error.
It requires preserving principles and explaining changes in interpretation.
A free person must be able to learn in public.
Independence requires transparency about relationships and interests.
Participation in a political party can be legitimate. The problem arises when relevant dependencies are concealed while absolute autonomy is claimed.
Reform values denunciation, research, civic education, monitoring of services, and community development.
These forms of participation can strengthen one another.
XVI — SPIRITUALITY, HUMILITY, AND RESPONSIBILITY
Spirituality can offer meaning, guidance, and commitment.
The idea of a spiritual guide, in the author’s thought, belongs to this dimension of interpreting life.
This manifesto respects faith without imposing it as a requirement of citizenship.
Religious and non-religious people can build relationships of care and justice.
Biblical references contribute to moral reflection:
Mark 10:13–16 recalls the welcoming of children.
Matthew 18:3–4 presents humility as a spiritual reference.
Proverbs 15:1 draws attention to the manner of responding.
James 3:13–18 connects wisdom, conduct, and peace.
Micah 6:8 brings together justice, mercy, and humility.
Romans 12:17–21 offers guidance against revenge.
John 9:1–3 challenges the simplistic attribution of suffering to the guilt of the person or their parents.
Prayer can accompany responsibility, work, and care.
It does not replace medical treatment, knowledge, or legal protection.
The passage from childhood to old age can be understood as an invitation to preserve humanity: to learn without losing humility and to accumulate experience without accumulating cruelty.
Mature integrity consists in possessing capacity and refusing to use it to destroy those who are vulnerable.
MORAL CHARTER FOR THE REFORM OF THE HUMAN ECOSYSTEM
A civic proposal for voluntary adoption, open to discussion and revision. It does not constitute enacted legislation or an international treaty.
Article 1 — Dignity
Every person must be recognised beyond their income, office, or property.
Article 2 — Birth
Childhood requires care, protection, and opportunities for development.
Article 3 — Care
Caregivers must receive support and participate in a fair distribution of responsibilities.
Article 4 — Family
Domestic authority must respect personal integrity, the right to be heard, and freedom.
Article 5 — Loss
The loss of employment, health, or power does not justify humiliation or abandonment.
Article 6 — Old Age
Dignity remains throughout dependence and the loss of autonomy.
Article 7 — The Spark
Capacity that has not yet been materialised deserves opportunities for learning and development.
Article 8 — Production
Production must consider usefulness, safety, remuneration, and environmental consequences.
Article 9 — Work
Decent work includes rights, rest, and protection against exploitation.
Article 10 — Unemployment
Lack of employment must not be treated as automatic moral guilt.
Article 11 — Power
The reach of power must be accompanied by limits and oversight.
Article 12 — Transition
Changes in leadership must preserve rights and institutional continuity.
Article 13 — Accountability
Protection against persecution must coexist with lawful investigation of unlawful acts.
Article 14 — Administration
Decisions must be made under proper authority, supported by reasons, and subject to means of challenge.
Article 15 — Public Resources
Collective resources do not belong personally to those who administer them.
Article 16 — Integrity
Organisations must prevent conflicts of interest and promote accountability.
Article 17 — Culture
Tradition must be open to preservation, examination, and reform.
Article 18 — Equality
Cultural diversity does not establish hierarchies of human dignity.
Article 19 — Education
Learning must develop knowledge and the capacity to question.
Article 20 — Correction
Every person must be able to revise an opinion on reasoned grounds.
Article 21 — Emotions
Emotional regulation must support decisions without silencing the denunciation of injustice.
Article 22 — Technology
Technology must support autonomy, privacy, rest, and life together.
Article 23 — Activism
Peaceful participation, denunciation, and association must be protected.
Article 24 — Transparency
Those acting in the name of the collective interest must disclose relevant interests.
Article 25 — Conscience
Freedom to believe, not to believe, and to change one’s convictions must be respected.
Article 26 — Knowledge
Hypotheses, interpretations, and scientific conclusions must be distinguished.
Article 27 — Environment
Present decisions must consider the living conditions of future generations.
Article 28 — Cooperation
Differences between nations must be addressed through dialogue and peaceful means.
Article 29 — Evaluation
Reform must observe results, acknowledge failures, and correct practices.
Article 30 — Continuity
This manifesto must remain open to criticism and revision.
XVII — FROM DECLARATION TO PRACTICE
Every family or institution can begin with a concrete problem.
A family can reorganise care without overburdening one person.
A school can change humiliating practices.
A business can publish promotion criteria.
A public service can explain deadlines and complaint procedures.
An association can make its funding transparent.
A political organisation can prepare for a change in leadership.
The process must include four stages:
Understand, experiment, evaluate, and correct.
Those affected by decisions must be heard.
A reform that consults only those who already possess power can reproduce the problem.
Results must be examined through information and experience.
Fewer complaints may mean improvement, but they may also mean fear.
More production may mean development, but it may also mean overburdening.
More technology may mean access, but it may also mean exclusion for those unable to use it.
Evaluation must ask what changed, for whom it changed, and at what cost.
XVIII — THE PAST, THE PRESENT, AND TOMORROW
The past offers memories of care, knowledge, and resistance.
It also offers examples of domination and exclusion.
Reform must learn from both.
The present requires us to recognise that we inherit systems already built, but participate in their continuation.
Every time we justify an abuse because it has always happened, we help preserve it.
Every time we correct a practice and protect someone, we open another possibility.
Tomorrow is not entirely under our control.
But today’s choices influence the conditions others will encounter.
A respected child receives a different experience.
An unemployed person who receives support finds better conditions for rebuilding their life.
An institution that allows decisions to be challenged can learn from its mistakes.
A safe transition reduces the fear of losing.
An economy that turns capacity into opportunity expands participation.
The future must be prepared through relationships and institutions capable of caring through change.
AUTHOR’S DECLARATION
The thought of Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo, developed in this Manifesto 6, places human administration before a fundamental responsibility:
To organise life without turning vulnerability into an instrument of power.
Consciousness learns.
The home educates.
Culture transmits.
Work materialises.
Production serves.
The institution organises.
Law sets limits.
The community provides support.
Humanity bears responsibility for the relationships it builds.
Reform requires understanding this connection and acting upon it.
The value of a family is also revealed when one of its members ceases to earn an income.
The value of an institution is also revealed when someone challenges a decision.
The value of a democracy is also revealed when power changes hands.
The value of an economy is also revealed in the opportunity offered to those still seeking to begin.
The value of a culture is also revealed in its capacity to protect people and correct practices.
Those who possess power must assume responsibility.
Those who possess knowledge must allow it to be examined.
Those who care must respect.
Those who administer must account for their actions.
Those who make mistakes must be able to correct them.
Those who lose a position must retain their dignity.
This is the commitment of Manifesto 6:
To build a human ecosystem in which a person does not need to possess wealth, influence, or power to be recognised, protected, and heard.
Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo
Angolan Thinker and Philosopher
Manifesto 6 — Consciousness, the Home, and Power
REFERENCES
The Author’s Documentary Sources
- The Systematic Origin of the Human Being and the Family — Human Management and Administration.
- THE BRAIN, book manuscript.
- The Birth of Modern Neuroscience and the Multilevel Architecture of Human Consciousness.
- Article on the Book The System.
- The Home as the Cradle of Law.
- Activism and Moral and Social Imprisonment.
- Employability Manifesto.
Legal Foundations
- United Nations. Charter of the United Nations, 1945.
- Organisation of African Unity. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 1981.
- African Union. African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, 2007.
- Republic of Angola. Constitution, consolidated version following the 2021 revision.
- National constitutions applicable to the proposed implementation measures.
Philosophical and Social Dialogue
- Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics; Politics.
- Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit, 1807.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. The Ecology of Human Development, 1979.
- Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed.
- Honneth, A. The Struggle for Recognition, originally published in 1992.
- Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons, 1990.
- Sen, A. Development as Freedom, 1999.
Scientific Research
- Gross, J. J. “The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review.” Review of General Psychology, 1998.
- Keltner, D.; Gruenfeld, D. H.; Anderson, C. “Power, Approach, and Inhibition.” Psychological Review, 2003.
- Allcott, H.; Braghieri, L.; Eichmeyer, S.; Gentzkow, M. “The Welfare Effects of Social Media.” American Economic Review, 2020.
Biblical References
Mark 10:13–16; Matthew 18:3–4; Proverbs 15:1; James 3:13–18; Micah 6:8; Romans 12:17–21; John 9:1–3.
GAESEMA PUBLISHING HOUSE
The Brand That Transcends Borders
Knowledge that transforms. Philosophy that liberates the world.
The GAESEMA Scientific and Philosophical Journal is internationally available, accessible to researchers, academics, thinkers, students, and readers committed to the intellectual, scientific, spiritual, and social transformation of humanity.
With original publications on philosophy, production, economics, spirituality, management, education, conscious innovation, and human development, GAESEMA promotes a new global consciousness — critical, practical, transformative, and oriented toward real solutions to contemporary challenges.
More than simply publishing content, GAESEMA proposes a new way of thinking about the world, encouraging constructive questioning, profound research, and the creation of knowledge applicable to human and institutional realities.
Discover bold ideas. Question the system. Inspire change.
Access the official platform:
https://gaesema.online/
Official Submission of Scientific Articles, Books and Academic Works
Researchers, lecturers, undergraduate, master’s and doctoral students, as well as independent authors, may submit:
- Scientific articles — 50% discount for Members
- Academic and philosophical books;
- Research papers;
- Scientific essays;
- Interdisciplinary and innovative works.
Official Contacts
Email: gaesefma@gmail.com
WhatsApp — Angola: +244 923 486 495
WhatsApp — Namibia: +264 81 742 9733
All scientific articles, previous editions, updated content, special publications, and institutional materials are available through GAESEMA’s official channels.
Participate. Publish. Become part of a philosophy that transcends borders.
INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION
Owning Entity: GAESEMA Investments Group (Pty) Ltd – Namibia
Institutional Partnership: ANGRIB, SA. / NANK, S.A. – Angola
International Headquarters: Windhoek – Namibia
Representation in Angola: Luanda – Kikuxi, Angola
Editor-in-Chief: Gilson Guilherme Miguel Ângelo
Official Institutional Contact
Angola: +244 923 486 495
Namibia: +264 81 742 9733
Institutional Email: gaesefma@gmail.com
Editorial Philosophy
“Thinking differently is creating the new.”
© All rights reserved by GAESEMA Publishing House.
Scientific citation is permitted provided that the source is properly referenced, in accordance with international principles of academic ethics and intellectual property.
G
